@dr1ft it sure was nice back when I worked on a certain doom mod, licensed under the GPL, to have all of my contributions stolen and credited to somebody else, with no recourse available to me (and they flaunted that fact *in my face*)

**Astra, smol catgirl** @dr1ft@cathoderay.tube · Jun 10, 2018, 21:04

**Astra, smol catgirl** @dr1ft@cathoderay.tube · Jun 10, 2018, 21:04

@KS in that case permissive licensing isnt going to do you much better

**Astra, smol catgirl** @dr1ft@cathoderay.tube · Jun 10, 2018, 21:04

**Astra, smol catgirl** @dr1ft@cathoderay.tube · Jun 10, 2018, 21:04

@KS im also pretty sure that's a violation of the gpl >.>

**Kaito / Katie Sinclaire** @KS · Jun 10, 2018, 21:09

**Kaito / Katie Sinclaire** @KS · Jun 10, 2018, 21:09

@dr1ft i do not believe it is unless you actually add additional terms to the license to prohibit that behavior.

**Astra, smol catgirl** @dr1ft@cathoderay.tube · Jun 10, 2018, 21:09

**Astra, smol catgirl** @dr1ft@cathoderay.tube · Jun 10, 2018, 21:09

@KS ok, then ill do that

**Kaito / Katie Sinclaire** @KS · Jun 10, 2018, 21:10

**Kaito / Katie Sinclaire** @KS · Jun 10, 2018, 21:10

@dr1ft except you have to be careful, because if you accidentally get too restrictive with your additional terms, anyone can just ignore it

> "If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term."